Subjective audits
Each auditor, their own scale.
The assessment depends on who runs it. Without shared criteria, two audits of the same process reach two different verdicts — impossible to make objective.
Starting February 23, you can access your NEXT application via the URL dedicated to your company, as indicated in the email you received.
If you run into any trouble, contact our support:
support.platform@agilea-group.com
NEXT App · Audit & maturity
A set of shared criteria, a configurable multi-axis assessment, and gap-to-target and impact views to prioritize your improvement initiatives — without subjectivity.
+18
maturity pts in 6 months
The challenge
Process audits pile up, but each one uses its own scoring scale. Without a common reference, results can’t be compared over time or across sites — and prioritizing initiatives stays a matter of intuition.
Each auditor, their own scale.
The assessment depends on who runs it. Without shared criteria, two audits of the same process reach two different verdicts — impossible to make objective.
Nothing is comparable.
Each team judges on its own scale. You can neither track progress over time nor compare two entities on a common basis.
You act on intuition.
Without an objective gap-to-target, improvement initiatives are launched where things “seem” urgent, not where the impact is actually greatest.
The solution
ProcessEval replaces implicit scoring scales with a common framework: criteria, maturity levels and axes that you configure. Everyone assesses with the same grid — results become comparable, over time and across sites. No black box: just a clear, auditable method.
A configurable framework
Criteria, maturity levels and vocabulary tailored to your business — not a rigid model imposed on you.
A multi-axis assessment
Score each process across several dimensions, fully configurable and weightable.
The gap-to-target, made clear
Compare the level reached against the target and see at a glance where to focus your effort first.
Your method, not ours
You define the grid; ProcessEval structures the assessment, the summary and the follow-up. Everything is configurable, down to the vocabulary.
How it works
Four steps to move from a subjective audit to initiatives prioritized by impact.
Configure the framework
Criteria, levels, axes and vocabulary tailored to your context.
Assess on the shop floor
Score each process, in a workshop, on a shared grid.
Measure the gap-to-target
Visualize the level reached vs the target, by axis and by process.
Prioritize the initiatives
Rank actions by impact and launch the right improvement initiatives.
The maturity scale
One scale, shared by everyone: each process is placed on five maturity levels — to speak the same language and aim for the right tier.
Implicit practices, dependent on individuals.
First routines, but varying case by case.
Process documented, shared and applied everywhere.
Measured and steered with indicators.
Continuously improved, embedded in the culture.
The targetFeatures
Define your criteria, maturity levels, axes and vocabulary. ProcessEval doesn’t impose a model: it structures yours — and makes it repeatable.
Score each process across several configurable, weightable dimensions.
Compare the level reached against the target, by axis and by process, at a glance.
Rank improvement initiatives where the maturity gain is greatest.
Compare entities, lines or workshops on a strictly common basis.
Share-ready assessment summaries, exports and reports in a few clicks.
Measurable impact
Typical results observed during maturity-assessment rollouts.
100 %
Of assessments on a common grid, repeatable and comparable
Less
Subjectivity: shared criteria, not opinions
More
Initiatives launched in the right place, thanks to the gap-to-target
1
A shared view of maturity, by site and over time
Results depend on scope, context and discipline of adoption. No guarantee — orders of magnitude confirmed by real-world rollouts.
NEXT platform
ProcessEval shares a common data layer with the other NEXT applications — project management, flow analysis, field audits and skills — for a 360° operational view.
Field audits & process maturity
DemandAnalyser, Workspaces…
The NEXT ecosystem keeps growing.
They use it
We used to assess our sites each in its own way. With a common framework, we finally compare on the same basis — and the debates about “who is best” have turned into action plans.
The gap-to-target changed our reviews: we no longer argue over gut feelings, we look at where the gap is largest and go there. Our initiatives are better targeted.
Being able to configure our own criteria and vocabulary made all the difference: the tool speaks our language, and adoption was immediate.
Frequently asked questions
The process-maturity assessment app of the NEXT ecosystem. You configure a framework (criteria, maturity levels, axes, vocabulary), assess your processes on this common grid, then read the gap-to-target to prioritize your improvement initiatives.
It’s the reference scale of your assessment: the list of criteria observed, the possible maturity levels (for example from 1 “informal” to 5 “optimized”), the analysis axes and the associated vocabulary. In ProcessEval, this framework is fully configurable.
Yes — that’s the whole point. ProcessEval doesn’t impose a rigid model: you adapt criteria, levels, axes, weightings and labels to your business and your culture. The tool structures YOUR method rather than imposing one.
No, it equips them. Whether you rely on a standard, a maturity model (CMMI, etc.) or your own grid, ProcessEval makes the assessment repeatable, comparable and tracked over time — without replacing your approach.
Yes. Since everyone assesses with the same framework, you compare sites, lines or workshops on a strictly common basis — and you track the progress of each one over time.
In a workshop, most often in the field: you go through the grid, score each process on the various axes, justify. ProcessEval consolidates the scores, computes the gap-to-target and produces the summary — ready to share.
Yes. It fits into Agilea’s NEXT ecosystem, alongside TaskFlow (flow-based project management), FlowAnalyzer (flow analysis) and SkillFlow (skills). The apps share a common data layer, for a 360° operational view.
Ready to make your audits objective?
Discover how ProcessEval turns your assessments into a prioritized roadmap — on a common framework, shared by all your teams.
Release notes
NEXT evolves continuously. Here are the platform's most recent versions.