Skip to content

Starting February 23, you can access your NEXT application via the URL dedicated to your company, as indicated in the email you received.
If you run into any trouble, contact our support: support.platform@agilea-group.com

NEXT App · Audit & maturity

Assess your process maturity objectively

A set of shared criteria, a configurable multi-axis assessment, and gap-to-target and impact views to prioritize your improvement initiatives — without subjectivity.

Configurable frameworks Multi-axis assessment Built & hosted in France
ProcessEval interface: process maturity assessment

The challenge

Plenty of audits.
Rarely compared

Process audits pile up, but each one uses its own scoring scale. Without a common reference, results can’t be compared over time or across sites — and prioritizing initiatives stays a matter of intuition.

01

Subjective audits

Each auditor, their own scale.

The assessment depends on who runs it. Without shared criteria, two audits of the same process reach two different verdicts — impossible to make objective.

02

No common reference

Nothing is comparable.

Each team judges on its own scale. You can neither track progress over time nor compare two entities on a common basis.

03

Best-guess prioritization

You act on intuition.

Without an objective gap-to-target, improvement initiatives are launched where things “seem” urgent, not where the impact is actually greatest.

The solution

An assessment that is objective and shared

ProcessEval replaces implicit scoring scales with a common framework: criteria, maturity levels and axes that you configure. Everyone assesses with the same grid — results become comparable, over time and across sites. No black box: just a clear, auditable method.

  • A configurable framework

    Criteria, maturity levels and vocabulary tailored to your business — not a rigid model imposed on you.

  • A multi-axis assessment

    Score each process across several dimensions, fully configurable and weightable.

  • The gap-to-target, made clear

    Compare the level reached against the target and see at a glance where to focus your effort first.

Your method, not ours

A tailor-made framework

You define the grid; ProcessEval structures the assessment, the summary and the follow-up. Everything is configurable, down to the vocabulary.

Criteria
Maturity levels
Assessment axes
Vocabulary
Weightings
Targets
ProcessEval · Gap-to-target
Receiving 82/80
Preparation 58/75
Shipping 41/70
Reporting 74/80
Level reached Target

How it works

From the grid to the roadmap

Four steps to move from a subjective audit to initiatives prioritized by impact.

  1. 1

    Configure the framework

    Criteria, levels, axes and vocabulary tailored to your context.

  2. 2

    Assess on the shop floor

    Score each process, in a workshop, on a shared grid.

  3. 3

    Measure the gap-to-target

    Visualize the level reached vs the target, by axis and by process.

  4. 4

    Prioritize the initiatives

    Rank actions by impact and launch the right improvement initiatives.

The maturity scale

From the informal process to the optimized

One scale, shared by everyone: each process is placed on five maturity levels — to speak the same language and aim for the right tier.

01

Informal

Implicit practices, dependent on individuals.

02

Repeatable

First routines, but varying case by case.

03

Defined

Process documented, shared and applied everywhere.

04

Managed

Measured and steered with indicators.

05

Optimized

Continuously improved, embedded in the culture.

The target

Features

Configure, assess, prioritize

Key feature

Configurable framework

Define your criteria, maturity levels, axes and vocabulary. ProcessEval doesn’t impose a model: it structures yours — and makes it repeatable.

Receiving82/100
Preparation58/100
Shipping41/100
Reporting74/100
02

Multi-axis assessment

Score each process across several configurable, weightable dimensions.

03

Gap-to-target

Compare the level reached against the target, by axis and by process, at a glance.

04

Impact-based prioritization

Rank improvement initiatives where the maturity gain is greatest.

05

Multi-site comparison

Compare entities, lines or workshops on a strictly common basis.

06

Summaries, exports & reports

Share-ready assessment summaries, exports and reports in a few clicks.

Measurable impact

Criteria rather than opinions

Typical results observed during maturity-assessment rollouts.

100 %

Of assessments on a common grid, repeatable and comparable

Less

Subjectivity: shared criteria, not opinions

More

Initiatives launched in the right place, thanks to the gap-to-target

1

A shared view of maturity, by site and over time

Results depend on scope, context and discipline of adoption. No guarantee — orders of magnitude confirmed by real-world rollouts.

NEXT platform

Part of the NEXT ecosystem

ProcessEval shares a common data layer with the other NEXT applications — project management, flow analysis, field audits and skills — for a 360° operational view.

You are here

ProcessEval

Field audits & process maturity

DemandAnalyser, Workspaces…

The NEXT ecosystem keeps growing.

They use it

Audits that are finally comparable

We used to assess our sites each in its own way. With a common framework, we finally compare on the same basis — and the debates about “who is best” have turned into action plans.
Operational Excellence Director
The gap-to-target changed our reviews: we no longer argue over gut feelings, we look at where the gap is largest and go there. Our initiatives are better targeted.
Continuous Improvement Manager
Being able to configure our own criteria and vocabulary made all the difference: the tool speaks our language, and adoption was immediate.
Quality Manager · Industry

Frequently asked questions

Audit & process maturity

What is ProcessEval?

The process-maturity assessment app of the NEXT ecosystem. You configure a framework (criteria, maturity levels, axes, vocabulary), assess your processes on this common grid, then read the gap-to-target to prioritize your improvement initiatives.

What is a maturity framework?

It’s the reference scale of your assessment: the list of criteria observed, the possible maturity levels (for example from 1 “informal” to 5 “optimized”), the analysis axes and the associated vocabulary. In ProcessEval, this framework is fully configurable.

Can I define my own criteria and vocabulary?

Yes — that’s the whole point. ProcessEval doesn’t impose a rigid model: you adapt criteria, levels, axes, weightings and labels to your business and your culture. The tool structures YOUR method rather than imposing one.

Does ProcessEval replace an ISO audit or a Lean diagnosis?

No, it equips them. Whether you rely on a standard, a maturity model (CMMI, etc.) or your own grid, ProcessEval makes the assessment repeatable, comparable and tracked over time — without replacing your approach.

Can several sites or entities be compared?

Yes. Since everyone assesses with the same framework, you compare sites, lines or workshops on a strictly common basis — and you track the progress of each one over time.

How does an assessment unfold?

In a workshop, most often in the field: you go through the grid, score each process on the various axes, justify. ProcessEval consolidates the scores, computes the gap-to-target and produces the summary — ready to share.

Is ProcessEval part of a larger platform?

Yes. It fits into Agilea’s NEXT ecosystem, alongside TaskFlow (flow-based project management), FlowAnalyzer (flow analysis) and SkillFlow (skills). The apps share a common data layer, for a 360° operational view.

Ready to make your audits objective?

Make your audits comparable

Discover how ProcessEval turns your assessments into a prioritized roadmap — on a common framework, shared by all your teams.

  • No commitment
  • Tailor-made framework
  • Audit & maturity

What are you looking for?

Type a keyword to search the entire site.